×

It’s not goodbye, it’s hello Magnifi!

You are now leaving a Magnifi Communities’ website and are going to a website that is not operated by Magnifi Communities. This website is operated by Magnifi LLC, an SEC registered investment adviser affiliated with Magnifi Communities.

Magnifi Communities does not endorse this website, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site. We are not responsible for the content or availability of linked site.

Take Me To Magnifi

Magnifi Communities

Are Stocks Stuck in a Trading Range til February?

Please enjoy this updated version of weekly commentary from the Reitmeister Total Return newsletter. Steve Reitmeister is the CEO of StockNews.com and Editor of the Reitmeister Total Return.
Click Here to learn more about Reitmeister Total Return

Stocks are likely going to be stuck in a trading range until the next Fed announcement on Wednesday February 1st.
Why?
Because investors have been burned many times before getting bullish in hopes of a Fed pivot that did not arrive.
So even with signs of moderating inflation providing a modest lift to stocks of late…there is a limit to the upside until investors hear from the Fed again. There is also limit to the downside. And this begets a trading range.
Let’s discuss the shape of the trading range and possible outcomes after the Fed announcement. All that and more is on tap for this week’s Reitmeister Total Return commentary.
Market Commentary
In many ways the trading range has already been in place for the past month flitting between 3,800 and 4,000 for the S&P 500.
And this is likely to stay in place as investors are fearful of reading the Fed tea leaves wrong as they have so many times this year. So even though there were welcome signs of moderating wage inflation (public enemy #1 to the Fed) there are enough whispers from the Fed that their job is far from done.
One such whisper from the Fed recently came from Atlanta Fed President, Ralph Bostic. During his speech he shared that interest rates will get above 5% and hold there for a while. He was then asked for how long would they remain elevated above 5% for which he stated emphatically. “three words: a long time”.
This harkens back to December 14th when the market was on the verge of a breakout above the 200 day moving average before Powell slammed the door on that notion. He too repeated the 3 word mantra (a long time) over and over again when discussing their plans for higher rates.
Plain and simple, Powell said that they fear damage from long term inflation much more than the downsides that come with a recession. And thus will remain aggressively hawkish until inflation is back down to the 2% target for good.
Investors got the memo loud and clear in mid December leading to a -6% bearish run for stocks. However, bit by bit investors are forgetting the Feds message as stocks float back higher in the range.
The main thing creating a lid on stock prices at the moment is a combination of the 200 day moving average at 3,990 followed by the psychologically important 4,000 level. You could call that a double reinforced resistance level that will be hard to crack without clear and decisively bullish news from the Fed.
Right now, from a Fed policy perspective I see little reason for investors to get seriously more bullish at this time. That’s because of the consistency of the higher rates for “a long time” mantra.
Also consider that from an economic perspective there are more and more signs of a recession forming early in 2023. Let’s refer to 3 key pieces of data from the past week that speak loudly to worsening economic conditions:
First, was ISM Manufacturing declining to 48.4 last week as New Orders lower at 45.2 means that the worst is yet to come. (Remember under 50 = contraction).
Second, we find that things are not much better on the services side of the ledger as ISM Services dropped abruptly from 56.5 to 49.6. And here again, the forward looking New Orders component was markedly worse at 45.2.
Let’s remember that the above services report was during December…the holiday shopping season when consumers normally put aside any concerns to spend lavishly on their families. However, there was much less “ho, ho, ho” in these results and much more “humbug”.
Lastly, on the economic front, the NFIB Small Business Optimism index was, well, NOT optimistic. That comes through loud and clear as it came in at a six month low of 89.8 when under 100 = contraction.
Here too we see these business owners not feeling good about what lies ahead as the 6 month business conditions outlook worsened with 51% predicting lower results ahead. The only positive to be found in this report is still ample job openings which likely keeps pressure on higher wages…which will keep the Fed on the offensive against inflation a good while longer.
To sum it up, I expect stocks to remain in this 3,800 to 4,000 trading range until we hear from the Fed. Or more specifically I think it will be very hard to break above that range.
On the downside, stocks could tumble lower before the Fed chimes in if the upcoming inflation reports are hotter than expected. That’s because investors would wisely read that information to mean that the Fed would stay aggressively hawkish a good while longer…thus increasing odds of recession and stock market downside.
This means we should put the following dates on our calendar:
1/12/23 = Consumer Price Index
1/18/23 = Producer Price Index
2/1/23 = Fed Rate Hike Decision and Powell Speech
Don’t give much credence to moves higher in the range for now as it likely will be all for not when the Fed takes the mic on February 1st. However, it is also possible that stocks crack lower before that if CPI or PPI shows inflation being too sticky which provides a forgone conclusion of what the Fed will on 2/1.
Long story short, the smart money still rides on recession forming with deeper bear market in coming months. Please trade accordingly.
Click Here to learn more about Reitmeister Total Return
Wishing you a world of investment success!
Steve Reitmeister… but everyone calls me Reity (pronounced “Righty”)CEO, StockNews.com & Editor, Reitmeister Total Return

About the Author
Steve is better known to the StockNews audience as “Reity”. Not only is he the CEO of the firm, but he also shares his 40 years of investment experience in the Reitmeister Total Return portfolio. Learn more about Reity’s background, along with links to his most recent articles and stock picks.

Are Stocks Stuck in a Trading Range til February? Read More »

Three Best Energy Dividend Picks After a Big 2022

Last year, the energy sector was the only market sector to post a positive return—and it did a heck of a job! The Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) gained 60% last year.

One-year gains like that may make you cautious about committing to energy this year, but I believe your portfolio should continue to hold an above-average energy weight.

Let’s look at some of the fundamentals…

The mega-cap energy companies give a good view of the sector. With a $440 billion market cap, Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) is one of the ten largest U.S. companies. Exxon is an integrated energy company with operations that include drilling for oil and gas, refining, and even retail. For the 2022 third quarter, the company reported earnings of $19.7 billion—yes, the company made almost $20 billion in one quarter!—and had $24 billion of cash flow from operations. For comparison, Alphabet (GOOG), with twice the market cap, earned $14 billion for the quarter. Despite appreciating by 65% over the past year, XOM trades at a P/E of 8.

Chevron Corp (CVX), with a $340 billion market cap, also operates as a fully integrated energy company. Chevron earned $11 billion in the third quarter, with $12.3 billion of free cash flow. After gaining 43% over the last year, CVX trades at a P/E of 9.

These large-cap energy companies will remain very profitable at current energy commodity prices. If oil and natural gas prices go up during the year (which I think is very probable), the share prices could post similar gains. I think both will beat the Wall Street estimates for fourth-quarter results.

However, I have a better idea for the energy sector for 2023. I predict energy midstream will generate very attractive total returns. Midstream companies operate gathering systems, pipelines, and terminals. The business operates on a fee basis with long-term contracts. Revenues and cash flow to pay dividends are stable and growing.

In the midstream sector, you find corporations and master limited partnerships (MLPs). Currently, I favor MLPs. Both camps have the same growth prospects, but the MLPs start the year with higher current yields.

Midstream companies will grow dividends by high single digits this year. Combine that growth with similar starting yields, and you end up with total returns in the mid teens.

Here are three MLPs with near 10% yields:

Crestwood Equity Partners LP (CEQP)

NuStar Energy LP (NS)

MPLX LP (MPLX)

MLPs do come with Schedules K-1 for tax reporting. They also pay tax-advantaged distributions. If you don’t want the hassles of K-1 reporting or want to own MLP investments in a qualified retirement account, I recommend the InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). AMZA pays stable monthly dividends and yields 8.6%—and there is a good chance of a dividend increase when the fund announces its January dividend.
One simple plan takes minutes to set up, yet could pay all your bills for life. No longer will your mailbox be stuffed with ‘payment due’ envelopes.This is our most powerful plan we’ve ever put together… and over 20,000 retirement investors have already used its recommendations.There is still time to start generating $4,084 per month for life… but the window is closing. Click here for complete details.

Three Best Energy Dividend Picks After a Big 2022 Read More »

What’s Next for mRNA Vaccine Makers

Before the coronavirus pandemic, most of us had never heard of mRNA vaccines, which is not surprising.

Although scientists had been experimenting with the technology for literally decades (reminiscent of fusion), the technology had never progressed beyond the laboratory and into widespread medical use. But now, many of us have been vaccinated against COVID-19 with mRNA vaccines.

However, the gold mine that was COVID vaccine quickly petered out. Here’s what’s next for these biotech companies…

For those of you unfamiliar on how exactly mRNA vaccines, here is a quick description from the Mayo Clinic website:

This type of vaccine uses genetically engineered mRNA to give your cells instructions for how to make the S protein found on the surface of the COVID-19 virus. After vaccination, your muscle cells begin making the S protein pieces and displaying them on cell surfaces. This causes your body to create antibodies. If you later become infected with the COVID-19 virus, these antibodies will fight the virus. After delivering instructions, the mRNA is immediately broken down. It never enters the nucleus of your cells, where your DNA is kept.

The two most-used mRNA vaccines currently come from Moderna (MRNA) and the joint venture formed by Pfizer (PFE) and BioNTech (BNTX).

After riding high for much of the pandemic, the mRNA vaccine pioneers came down to earth hard in 2022. By mid-June 2022, the stock prices for both Moderna and Germany’s BioNTech had more than halved.

The Next Act for mRNA Technology Companies

But luckily for these companies, mRNA technology is more than a one-trick pony. It’s possible to use mRNA to trigger immune responses to other bodily invaders, including influenza and even cancer.

In fact, an announcement a few weeks ago from Moderna and partner Merck (MRK) has reignited interest in these companies. The two companies—jointly working on this project for six years—published a promising set of melanoma trial results in mid-December. The data released showed that a combination of the Moderna’s experimental cancer vaccine and Merck’s immunotherapy drug, Keytruda, reduced the risk of death or recurrence of melanoma in high-risk patients by 44%, compared with treatment using only Keytruda.

The results sent Moderna stock soaring 27% in the two trading days after their release.

The results emboldened Merck and Moderna to embark on a much larger Phase 3 trial (the Phase 2 trial involved only 157 patients). The companies will also test the combination against other kinds of cancer. “We believe that this should work in many tumor types, not only melanoma,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in an interview.

Keep in mind, though, that unlike your typical vaccine, these shots will treat, not prevent, the disease.

In brief, here’s how a cancer vaccine would work: you get the tissue from a patient’s tumor, sequence it, and then, over a six-week period of time, you manufacture a vaccine that matches the top 10 to 20 mutations. The tailor-made vaccine stimulates a person’s immune system to selectively target those cancer cells.

Huge Potential

So, after five decades of failed attempts, cancer vaccines may be set for a breakthrough.

The nearly $17 billion jump in Moderna’s market value over two days following the announcement reflected investors’ hopes that cancer vaccines can work and become as common as the company’s mRNA vaccines.

Analysts from Jeffries say that the later-stage melanoma treatment market could be worth up to $5 billion (or between $9 and $15 per share in earnings) to Moderna. That figure may turn out to be far too conservative if mRNA vaccine technology works against other types of tumors.

Of course, there is no guarantee that the next phase of the Moderna/Merck clinical trials will be as encouraging as the last. And, even if the vaccine does work against melanoma, can the results be duplicated when tried against other types of cancers?

I think it can. Targeting multiple antigens decreases the odds that cancer cells will mutate in ways that make the vaccine useless, because the immune system will be attacking on multiple fronts. That makes personalized vaccines a great fit for fast-mutating cancers.

But we shall find out for sure in the years ahead.

Meanwhile, here’s how I look at both Moderna and BioNTech, which is working on its own half dozen or so cancer vaccines with companies like Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN).

While many innovative biotech companies are struggling to raise funds, a successful coronavirus vaccine has left Moderna with roughly $7 billion of net cash. BioNTech has double that amount. The companies can now apply both their cash and the knowhow they gained during the pandemic to other urgent medical needs like cancer treatments.

Neither company is a low-risk investment. However, both Moderna and BioNTech look cheap when you consider the potential for cancer vaccines. Both Moderna around $175 a share and BioNTech at about $150 a share seem like reasonable bets.
It’s not REITs or blue chips like Disney. A small, little-talked about area of the dividend stock market is pumping out market-beating returns like no tomorrow. Over 22 years, they’ve handily beat the market… and I have the #1 stock of these to give you now.

What’s Next for mRNA Vaccine Makers Read More »

The 4 Most Attractive Long-Term Stock Picks

The stock market witnessed heightened volatility last year due to lingering macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds. While inflation cooled for two consecutive months, minutes from the Federal Reserve’s December meeting show that policymakers expect to continue increasing rates in 2023 and keep them higher for ‘some time’ until the 2% inflation target is met. Bloomberg’s monthly

The 4 Most Attractive Long-Term Stock Picks Read More »

Is Dollar’s Dominance Over?

Last September, the Congressional Research Service published an “In Focus” report. They had already attempted to address speculation about the dollar’s dominance in the face of global economic and geopolitical changes at the time.
Three major threats were addressed in that document.
China and its currency have risen to sixth place, accounting for 1.66% of global payments.
The next source of concern was US financial sanctions, as the share of Russian exports to Brazil, China, India, and South Africa in US dollars fell from 85% in Q2 2018 to 36% in Q4 2021.
Digital currencies, which include cryptocurrencies and digital currencies issued by central banks, have completed the list.

“Some policymakers have expressed concerns about an international race to create a digital currency with widespread adoption, arguing that the United States should create a U.S. digital currency to maintain the dollar’s prominence in international payments.”
“To date, there is no evidence of a shift away from the US dollar as the dominant reserve currency,” the study concluded.
Back in October, I shared my most recent update for the dollar index, as it hit the first target with a fresh outlook.
At the time, I proposed two paths for the dollar: a continuation to the next target of $121 on an aggressively hawkish Fed, or a consolidation before resuming to the upside. The majority of readers supported both paths, with the consolidation option coming out on top.
The question of the dollar’s dominance is resurfacing these days, as its value has plummeted dramatically. It is too early to tell whether this is a consolidation or a global reversal.
One thing is certain: the path of unending growth has been abandoned.
In my charts, I see a clash of perspectives. The technical chart is about to give a strong bearish signal. The chart comparing fundamental factors, on the other hand, supports the king currency’s continued strength.
Let me show you each of them one by one, beginning with the emerging bearish alert.
Source: TradingView
In the dollar index daily chart above, there are two simple moving averages. The blue line represents the 50-day moving average, while the red line represents the 200-day moving average.
We can see that the short-term blue line very closely approached the long-term red line from above last week. When it falls below the latter, a bearish pattern known as a “Death Cross” will form. It will indicate a downward shift in the trend.
Furthermore, the RSI indicator failed to cross above the critical 50 level when the December Bullish Divergence played out.
The first support could be near the $100 round number. The previous high of $97.4 established in January of last year is the next support.

 Loading …
Let us now compare the real interest rates of the dollar’s major competitors.
Source: TradingView
The yearly chart of the dollar index (black line) above is compared to the real interest differentials of the major components of the US dollar index.
The real interest rate differentials are depicted on the scale B with the blue line for the United States and the Eurozone, orange line for the United States and the United Kingdom, and red line for the United States and Japan.
This time I added the correlation ratios with interest rate differentials in the same colors.
Currently, the strongest correlation of the dollar index is with the real interest rate differential between the United States and the Eurozone (blue), which is close to absolute at 0.92.

The second highest reading is 0.89 for the US-UK (orange), and the lowest but still positive correlation is 0.63 for Japan.
All of the correlation ratios are at their highest points.
All differentials are rising and at higher levels than in October, which should help the dollar. For the first time since 2019, Japan’s reading has risen above zero. The dollar index is lagging far behind E.U. and U.K. readings, which point to the $130 area. The dollar’s accumulated growth potential is enormous.
We can use the time period between 1995 and 2001 as a sample for the reversal signal. The UK differential began to fall in 1995, Japan’s differential in 1997, and the Eurozone differential in 1999.
Despite this, the dollar index rose until 2001, when it peaked and reversed to the downside. If this sample is applied to the current situation, the dollar index may rise in 2023-2024, even if differentials have already peaked.

 Loading …
Intelligent trades!
Aibek BurabayevINO.com Contributor
Disclosure: This contributor has no positions in any stocks mentioned in this article. This article is the opinion of the contributor themselves. The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. This contributor is not receiving compensation (other than from INO.com) for their opinion.

Is Dollar’s Dominance Over? Read More »

4 Semiconductor Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023

The semiconductor industry witnessed a decline in its performance last year in the face of aggressive interest rate hikes by the Fed and escalating tensions between the United States and China. The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) announced global semiconductor industry sales were $45.50 billion during November 2022, a decrease of 2.9% compared to October 2022

4 Semiconductor Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023 Read More »

After a Record-Bad 2022, Here’s What Investors Can Expect

Last year, 2022, closed out as one of the worst years for investors on record. Stocks suffered a bear market, with the S&P 500 down 20% from its January high, and the Nasdaq lost 35%.

These numbers weren’t close to records, but when you add the record decline in bond prices, it was one of, if not the worst, year on record for a balanced portfolio.

What clues does history offer as we look ahead to 2023?

First, I think making historical comparisons is challenging in this modern world. Investing and trading are very different today. Most of the past results occurred before we had an instant news cycle and the ability to trade without paying large commissions. For example, before the 1990s and the widespread use of the Internet, stock prices showed up daily in the Wall Street Journal, and it cost $100 or more in commissions to trade 100 shares of stock.

With that in mind, let’s look at some stock market history. In the last 50 years, the S&P 500 has posted consecutive down years just twice. The first occurrence occurred five decades ago, in 1973 and 1974. And the market experienced three successive down years, from 2000 through 2002. The Great Financial Crisis had just a single negative year, 2008. The market bottomed in March 2009 and finished with a 26% gain for that year.

2009 may be a good reference for 2023. When the market turned higher after that March bottom, stock prices went gangbusters. From its 2008 closing value until the March 2009 low, the S&P 500 dropped by 26%. It was a brutal time to be an investor. But over the final nine months of 2009, stocks gained 67%!

Bond prices are a different beast. Bond values are a mathematical function driven by interest rates. When rates go up, bonds go down. At some point in the next four-to-six months, the Federal Reserve will stabilize rates, and bond prices will do the same.

These historical anecdotes coincide with my belief that the first half of 2023 will remain volatile. But there is a strong potential for share price gains during the second half of the year.

Since my strategies focus on building an income stream, these next few months will let my subscribers build up their income stock positions, locking in excellent yields. I have added some high-yield bond investments to my Dividend Hunter recommendations list.

I know investing can be emotionally challenging when the market seems completely unpredictable. The truth is that it is always unpredictable. Investors in March 2009 had no clue that stocks would gain 67% by the end of the year. I tell my subscribers that if they invest with the goal of building their dividend income, share prices will take care of themselves.

Investing to grow your income naturally leads to buying when prices are down and watching your portfolio grow when prices move higher.

Look at Starwood Property Trust (STWD) for one stock to pick up now. At the current $18.50, STWD yields 10.5%. To get back to the historical typical yield of 7.5%, the shares must climb to more than $25.00.
What’s the one thing you need to stay retired? That’s right… cash. Money to pay the bills. Money to weather any financial crisis like the one we’re in now and whatever comes next. I’ve located three stocks that if you buy and hold them forever, they could serve as the backbone to your retirement. Click here for details.

After a Record-Bad 2022, Here’s What Investors Can Expect Read More »